I am, in many respects, a very ignorant person,l especially when it comes down to religion. For example: in Slovakia, we have this Christmas tradition of eating sweet, thin wafers with honey before (and, if you like it, also during) Christmas dinner. I always enjoyed it very much, because a) it tastes good (come and see for yourself, we have a few spare ones) and b) I always thought that this was what that thingy (‘the body of Christ’) the Catholics eat during the Communion tasted like. Strike one.
I also though, like many other non-Christians/atheists, that Jesus was born from the Immaculate Conception (not to be confused with Immaculate Collection by Madonna). This isn’t so. After painstaking research on Wikipedia, I discovered that it was really the Blessed Virgin Mary who was born this way, so that she could bear God’s son and not pass on the sin-that-everyone-is-born-with-because-Adam-and-Eve-ate-the-apple (I can’t remember what it’s called). Strike two.
So, here goes my last shot. I always thought that for Christians, Jesus was the guiding principle, the Son-of-God who guided them. His teachings, were partially coming from the Jewish Tradition, but with revisions (like: ‘Eye for an eye vs. Love thy neighbor’). In essence, Jesus was like a philosopher who captured the Zeitgeist if his time. He knew that humanity could not follow one set of rules for all its existence, for societies and environments evolve, and so does the human condition. In time when the Roman empire sought to unify the World and bring peace (this view might be debatable), so did Jesus wish to bring peace, new insights and basically update a faith to be fitter for a new society. We all know how that ended up. But never did I hear that Jesus in the New Testament criticized stem cell research to save lives, divorcing an alcoholic and abusive partner, wanting to die in dignity, marry the partner of the same gender or go shopping on Sunday. Sure, sometimes I found a things bit unclear, if not contradictory, but it felt like Jesus didn’t need to control every aspect of human life, it came down to being a good person and learning from your mistakes.
But now, some huge authorities feel like they can combine everything in the Bible as it suits them and have the, while ignoring that the New Testament is an open ended revision that seeks continuity, but somehow rejects the rigidness of the Old Testament. That is why they, in my view combine everything so shamelessly and claim that is what the Christian faith is about. Christian Faith surely should be built on Jesus, on not on the stuff he decided to reject/revise. I think it was a worthy wager to count upon the human intelligence and religion to evolve with the Zeitgeist, and I think Jesus definitely put his faith there. Maybe he should have written down all his thoughts, in order to clarify things for everyone. Strike three?
Coming up this or maybe next month: my very own Ms. President, tales of acting local, and all the other stuff I promised last time.
Peter
Posted by petersmisek 











Posted by petersmisek
Posted by petersmisek 



